#17988: Implement fully-packed loops
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jessicapalencia | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64, asm, fpl | Merged in:
Authors: James Campbell, | Reviewers:
Vince Knight, Jessica Striker, | Work issues:
Kevin Dilks, Emily Gunawan | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 7e38bd9c39c66532d63a9e087533979dbb596277
Branch: u/vinceknight/fpl | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by egunawan):
Since I was only involved in putting the method to_fully_packed_loop, I
can be one of the reviewers.
I think we should put the function __eq__ so that we can test equality
using "==". For example ...
sage: m=AlternatingSignMatrix([[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1]])
sage: m.to_fully_packed_loop() == FullyPackedLoop(m)
False
sage: FullyPackedLoop(m) == FullyPackedLoop(m)
False
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17988#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
