#17548: Partitions() is buggy
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ferriszorro | Owner: ferriszorro
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: Partitions | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/combinat/equal_min_max_slope_fix|
44d1cfb45c137d7d8ac6eb481bf6145ec57c12e4
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: #17637, #17956
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by aschilling):
Replying to [comment:48 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:45 tscrim]:
> > These violate the internal assumptions
> Then you really should add checks in the code raising an exception if
the condition is not satisfied. If you do add such checks, make sure to
add them to `IntegerListsLex` and not the `Partitions`/`Compositions`
front-ends.
>
> But even better would be to just allow such input.
In principle, all these bugs should now be fixed with #17979. Please
check!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17548#comment:49>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
