#17392: Make list of built-in normal form games
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  kcrisman           |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  game theory        |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days64             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent Knight,    |    Reviewers:
  James Campbell                     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  9d979d4fe5538ce88ce31861d5740c53be2fda1f
  u/vinceknight/catalog_of_games     |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 A quick read-through says great and thorough work.  There are a few typos
 and I will want to check my sources as well to make sure we are agreeing
 on the standard definitions for some of the games (and I may not be able
 to do that for some time given my current duties) but in general this will
 be a great resource and I wish I were teaching game theory so I could!
 Also, I would parametrize Chicken if it were me, but maybe this isn't a
 parametrized game form?

 Oh, and I am agnostic on where the tab-completion happens, but since
 `game_theory` covers more than non-cooperative game theory I wonder about
 that - maybe `game_theory.normal_form_games.[tab]`, though that is
 cumbersome-ish (only -ish because of tab-completion in the first place).
 Of course, you all have implemented the entire thing so maybe it doesn't
 matter... but if CGT or some more standard cooperative stuff "examples"
 get implemented then it could be useful to separate those catalogs.
 Particularly for combinatorial game theory there is likewise a standard
 set of basic examples (like Nim) and I wonder about confusion there, which
 can't happen in graph or matroid catalogs.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17392#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to