#18050: Implement dual equivalence graphs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: dual equivalence | Merged in:
graphs | Reviewers:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | c1b36373ccd085a893736c93e06294b461cbe193
public/crystals/dual_equivalence-18050| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
In other news, here's something I've been long since curious about:
{{{
+ -
:meth:`~sage.categories.regular_crystals.RegularCrystals.ParentMethods.dual_equivalence_graph`
+ - :meth:`sage.combinat.partition.Partition.dual_equivalence_graph`
}}}
What is the difference between the syntax with the tilde and that without?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18050#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
