#17830: Comparison of number field elements dependent of real embedding
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  number fields      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  sd66               |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent            |    Reviewers:
  Delecroix,  Štěpán Starosta        |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  96ac61e74d5dc073fe6d11570ed0be0934c50c77
  u/vdelecroix/17830                 |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Vincent Delecroix,  \u0160t\u011bp\xe1n Starosta', 
'oldvalue': u'Vincent Delecroix'}):

 * status:  new => needs_review
 * commit:  82f6d09a1f62887d0e5b72b81a8def80edb0d414 =>
     96ac61e74d5dc073fe6d11570ed0be0934c50c77
 * branch:  u/sstarosta/17830 => u/vdelecroix/17830
 * author:  Vincent Delecroix => Vincent Delecroix,  Štěpán Starosta


Comment:

 The two failing doctests come from the introduction of the method
 `_real_mpfi_`. I just propose to get rid of it in this ticket. The main
 reason is that there are a lot of duplication between:
  - AA and QQbar
  - RLF and CLF
  - what is implemented in this ticket for number fields

 I propose to clean it up in ticket #18103 and add the `_real_mpfi_`
 feature there.

 Vincent
 ----
 New commits:
 
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=d0f6f7b7cd539f3bf97538e2b871b4a526fc4f0c
 d0f6f7b]||{{{Trac 17830: simpler initialization + TODO}}}||
 
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=96ac61e74d5dc073fe6d11570ed0be0934c50c77
 96ac61e]||{{{Trac 17830: revert the introduction of _real_mpfi_}}}||

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17830#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to