#18097: Parity check matrix-related methods
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dlucas | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: sd66 | Merged in:
Authors: David Lucas | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dlucas/new_methods_in_linear_code| a323216099a43a1b697b67228966d479acf7e604
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
Comment:
Hello,
From what I understand from your examples, I guess that having no syndrome
means that you belong to the code. If so, it would be cool to have it in
the documentation.
I tried to see the path used by your syndrome method. It is quite
complicated as it goes through the dual code. This is relatively fast on
the small examples you have but might be a trouble if you rely intensively
on this method later on. Isn't there something more efficient?
Does it make sense only for vectors in `GF(2)`? Otherwise, please add
examples with more exotic finite fields.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18097#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
