#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | e60c3321ea62eeec8e8a1a07d964198ed8205479
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
The first lines of `_check_lexicographic_iterable` are `if self._warning
or not self._check: return`.
It sounds a bit wrong that the check function would do nothing when
explicitly asked to. Instead of stopping early in this situation, could
you remove those two lines and only call the function when you mean to?
This would give the function its original meaning: check the data.
Note that the function is only called once.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:325>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
