#16222: Faster exactification using numeric minpoly
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: gagern | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Martin von Gagern | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/gagern/ticket/16222 | 998534a33a502a86518f6c541f99cac1ffacdaa5
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by gagern):
Replying to [comment:15 vdelecroix]:
> Option 3 is definitely needed.
>
> For options 2 and 4 there is a right balance to find.
I guess once we have a method which can be called by hand, we can use that
to experiment a bit, in our daily work, and can ask others to do the same.
That might give us some intuition about when to use which. So I'd keep
this out of this ticket for now, and instead post a follow-up ticket to
investigate that.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16222#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
