#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | ac68bde6207f8afb059dbfcdce38d4a7c1f5c1a8
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> We definitely should keep it around for benchmarking purposes at least
> until #18055 is finished. I am fine adding the removal of
> `integer_list_old` to the todo list for this ticket.
I do not see the point. You can checkout Sage 6.5 whenever you like if you
ever need to benchmark this old (and broken) code.
> A user reading this documentation is likely to know about integer
> partitions, compositions or such.
You cannot make assumptions like that. A user might find this class
because he was redirected there after reading the doc of `IntegerVectors`
(for instance).
> I am fine making it into a SEEALSO if that's ok to put one before
> INPUT.
Works for me.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:422>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
