#17847: Cython: embed signatures in docstrings of Sage library code
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer           |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  cython             |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer,    |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Jeroen
  Simon King                         |  Demeyer
Report Upstream:  Fixed upstream,    |  Work issues:
  but not in a stable release.       |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  23390a1d85791bfe3a6f12ef667cf27d7bbf69a2
  u/jdemeyer/ticket/17847            |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:91 jdemeyer]:
 > Can we remove the support for embedding information from
 `sagedoc.format`?

 I thought that this was orthogonal to the "embedded information" question.
 In the sense that it is not format's job to remove the information.

 Where would it be relevant? When doing `obj?`? What happens when `obj?` is
 typed? I guess `sagedoc.format` is applied in that case, but ''what'' is
 it applied to?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17847#comment:93>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to