#18168: Ref: add various missing modules to r/quadratic_forms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mmezzarobba | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Marc Mezzarobba | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/mmezzarobba | Commit:
/ref-quadratic_forms | 09e1e4e6394df82fc1044d96e9d132b33cffed56
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by mmezzarobba):
* status: needs_info => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:3 jdemeyer]:
> I don't think all these `quadratic_form__*` modules need to be added,
aren't they just methods of quadratic forms?
Yes, mostly, indeed.
I ''think'' all functions in these modules are imported as members of
`quadratic_form.QuadraticForm` and already picked up by sphinx for this
reason, except for `quadratic_form__evaluate`, whose contents are imported
at the module level. I have updated the `rst` file accordingly. But I
didn't check super-thoroughly, and of course, that's not a very robust way
of doing things in the first place.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18168#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
