#18109: Restructure IntegerListLex code
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/18109 | 9fbbd3c6c2900b5d6f326846522338774751cfe8
Dependencies: #18181 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
A comment on the design... Should we really support +Infinity in the
iterator? I would go for `unsigned int` variables and `UINT_MAX` as a
synonmyous for Infinity. Of course it makes sense for the higher classes
(e.g. to give a proper answer to `.cardinality()`).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18109#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
