#18036: I should not be symbolic
---------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix     |        Owner:
           Type:  defect         |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major          |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  number fields  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                 |    Merged in:
        Authors:                 |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A            |  Work issues:
         Branch:                 |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                 |     Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by mmezzarobba):

 Proof of concept to see what would break: `u/mmezzarobba/18036-QQi`. Still
 needs quite a bit of work, but all tests should pass (I didn't run them
 all with the last version of the code). Any comment or improvement
 welcome!

 In particular:
 * Are there behavior changes that you think are not acceptable, or not
 acceptable without a deprecation?
 * I'm not happy with the changes to `sage.geometry.hyperbolic_space`
 (which apparently relied on operations involving `I` triggering coercions
 to `SR`), but I don't understand the code well enough to do better.

 Tangentially related: now may be a good time to deprecate (or remove
 directly?) the bogus coercion from `SR` to `QQbar`.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18036#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to