#18036: I should not be symbolic
---------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by mmezzarobba):
Proof of concept to see what would break: `u/mmezzarobba/18036-QQi`. Still
needs quite a bit of work, but all tests should pass (I didn't run them
all with the last version of the code). Any comment or improvement
welcome!
In particular:
* Are there behavior changes that you think are not acceptable, or not
acceptable without a deprecation?
* I'm not happy with the changes to `sage.geometry.hyperbolic_space`
(which apparently relied on operations involving `I` triggering coercions
to `SR`), but I don't understand the code well enough to do better.
Tangentially related: now may be a good time to deprecate (or remove
directly?) the bogus coercion from `SR` to `QQbar`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18036#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.