#17927: Discarded arguments in IntegerVector
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.6
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 4301c4cbdb48a00e9950292b7ce2e84a2b0388c0
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/17927 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:24 ncohen]:
> > It was *your* decision to take over my work because *you* felt it was
better to have this intermediate step.
>
> What ? To take over your work? `O_o`
By "my work" here, I meant "rebasing your branch on top of #17979".
> 17 months ago you were also going to fix cartesian products (#15425).
This is a long run task. More than half of the items are already
achieved.
> See also #18182 which was created yesterday.
#18182 is not a fix. It's a new feature. Beside I am actively helping
out Daniel who is working on it here at Sage Days 67.
When contributing infrastructure one certainly is responsible for
making sure that the infrastructure is robust, and that the basic
applications are available. But there is no reason why one should
implement each and every application of the infrastructure.
> And there are many many things that you were going to fix 3 or 5 years
ago.
And I did many of them, and in particular I believe I did all for
which I had set a specific timeline. And in the mean time I did a lot
of infrastructure, refactoring, and finalization work, prioritized
according to the needs of many people.
Now, and again, you are not my boss to judge on how I prioritize on
the many tasks that needs to be done.
> I don't know what work you are talking about.
3 hours of hard work on a proper cleanup of integer vectors (currently
stashed out), that I now need to rebase when it would have been more
productive to do all at once.
Anyway, done with this ticket. Bye.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17927#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
