#16352: TransitiveIdeal -> RecursivelyEnumeratedSet in the sage library
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
slabbe | Status: needs_work
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.6
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: sd66 | Commit:
Authors: | cecda3246fdbbf96cfb8461ee426dc9d079910ec
Sébastien Labbé | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/slabbe/16352 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
got
{{{
sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/dyck_word.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/combinat/dyck_word.py", line 3501, in
sage.combinat.dyck_word.DyckWords_size.__init__
Failed example:
TestSuite(DyckWords(4,2)).run()
Expected nothing
--
The following tests failed: _test_enumerated_set_iter_cardinality
**********************************************************************
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16352#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
