#18237: upgrade to pynac-0.3.5
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Ralf Stephan | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/rws/pynac035 | c5ac7dcca650cef95ed65cfb77c51b111fd80193
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by behackl):
I'm also quite sure that it has nothing to do with this ticket; especially
after Vincent confirmed that this is happening for him too on both
`6.7.beta0` and `6.7.beta1`. This discussion, however, belongs to the
`sage-devel` thread.
Still, I don't like the idea of giving this `positive_review` when I don't
have a passing `ptestlong`, regardless of why the doctest is failing.
Currently, I'm compiling sage on two more machines; one of those should
enable me to review this.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18237#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
