#18244: mysterious doctest failure on dyck_word.py
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
vdelecroix | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
documentation | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 5dfb8363c6fe1920dbaa09e3bae1e8f5a76be34c
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
public/18244 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:12 vdelecroix]:
> I like this to be restrictive. See also #18159. I often write things
like
> {{{
> return S1.cardinality().factorial()
> }}}
> which would break if it was a Python integer.
OK, fair point.
> And which infinity?
Is there not a corresponding test for infinite enumerated sets?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18244#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
