#11332: 65x penalty in performance for using float instead of RealNumber
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: pang | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: | Resolution:
symbolics | Merged in:
Keywords: float, | Reviewers:
RealNumber | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
Dependencies: |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by mmezzarobba):
Wait, what exactly are we trying to measure? I thought this ticket was
about the overhead of `exp()` (I mean `sage.functions.log.exp`) for some
argument types. If we allow ourselves to call the “right” function or
method for each type, then both `RDF(x).exp()` and `math.exp(x)` are fast
when applicable.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11332#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
