#6649: [with patch, positive review] doctest failure in decorate.py (on OS X 
only)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  GeorgSWeber  |       Owner:  GeorgSWeber
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  assigned   
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.1 
Component:  porting      |    Keywords:             
 Reviewer:  mhampton     |      Author:             
   Merged:               |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by wdj):

 What I got agrees with what you said should happen:

 {{{
 Loading Sage library. Current Mercurial branch is: 6649
 sage: @parallel()
 ....: def f(N): return N^2
 ....:
 sage: v = list(f([1,2,4])); v.sort(); v
 [(((1,), {}), 1), (((2,), {}), 4), (((4,), {}), 16)]
 sage: @parallel('reference')
 ....: def f(N): return N^2
 ....:
 sage: v = list(f([1,2,4])); v.sort(); v
 [(((1,), {}), 1), (((2,), {}), 4), (((4,), {}), 16)]
 sage: sage.parallel.ncpus.ncpus()
 2
 sage:
 }}}
 So changing this from "needs review" to "positive review".

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6649#comment:8>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to