#17890: Remove _(rich)cmp_c_impl
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: cython | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17890 | 17bd067153ad40ced061147390687f514a7f7cba
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:36 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:33 vdelecroix]:
> > Replying to [comment:32 jdemeyer]:
> > > Replying to [comment:28 vdelecroix]:
> > > > Moreover if you redefine `__cmp__` in your Element class then
`Element.__cmp__` is not called!
> > > Of course not, that's a general rule for inheritance.
> >
> > I thought this was not the case for cython classes which redefine
`__hash__`! Is it only true for `__richcmp__`?
> I don't understand what you are saying. For any method `foo`, the
statement "if you redefine `foo` in your Element class then `Element.foo`
is not called" is true.
Why in extension class one has to copy/paste the definition of
`__richcmp__`?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17890#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
