#6484: sage.combinat.ranker improvements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: nthiery
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: rank, unrank | Merged in:
Authors: nthiery | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/nthiery/sage_combinat_ranker_improvements|
32d5cea664e153895d663b5913e45d03b8c0a305
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Old description:
> sage.combinat.ranker needs improvements:
> - With:
> {{{
> sage: f = sage.combinat.ranker.rank_from_list([...])
> }}}
>
> f uses ``list.index``, and is therefore `O(n)`. This should be made
> `O(1)` with a hash table.
>
> Further potential improvement (for a later ticket?):
>
> - make the rank / unrank objects produced by this library picklable.
New description:
sage.combinat.ranker needs improvements:
- With:
{{{
sage: f = sage.combinat.ranker.rank_from_list([...])
}}}
f uses `list.index`, and is therefore `O(n)`. This should be made
`O(1)` with a hash table.
Further potential improvement (for a later ticket?):
- make the rank / unrank objects produced by this library picklable.
--
Comment (by nthiery):
Should we worry about backward compatibility and revert to l.index if any
of the object is not hashable?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6484#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
