#18349: One-fold tensor products: fix repr and document the behavior
---------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: elixyre | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: tensor, categories | Merged in:
Authors: Jean-Baptiste Priez | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by elixyre):
Thanks, it seems clear to me now.
Replying to [comment:2 nthiery]:
> Would you have a suggestion for a good repr in this case?
I don't have any opinion, may be:
{{{
sage: h = Sym(QQ).h()
sage: tensor([h])
Tensor:[Symmetric Functions over Rational Field in the homogeneous basis]
}}}
?
Replying to [comment:2 nthiery]:
> We also probably want to highlight the above behavior in the
> documentation of `tensor?`.
May be...
In this way, I have an other stupid question, when we have a tensor
product:
{{{
sage: S = NCSF(QQ).S()
sage: t = tensor([h, S])
}}}
There is a friendly way to recover `h` and `S` from `t`?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18349#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
