#18278: Variable to non-integral power for integer polynomials (using Flint) is
broken
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  bruno              |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  commutative        |   Resolution:
  algebra                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  integer            |    Reviewers:
  polynomials, exponentiation        |  Work issues:
        Authors:  Bruno Grenet       |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  4ade279cb4e0bf5965f907ff498168967cd23add
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
  u/bruno/ticket/non_integral_pow    |
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 My guess is that the code using `PyNumber_Index()` is slightly faster than
 `PyNumber_AsSsize_t()`. Also, `PyNumber_Index()` is more general, since
 you don't need the result to be a `Py_ssize_t`. But really, the difference
 between these 2 functions is very small.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18278#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to