#18293: libgd fails to build on Archlinux
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: aapitzsch | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: packages: standard | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: André Apitzsch | Reviewers: Volker
Report Upstream: N/A | Braun
Branch: | Work issues:
fd489bf083f69e84c48ead6b6b7afa521593d783 | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by leif):
* commit: fd489bf083f69e84c48ead6b6b7afa521593d783 =>
Comment:
Replying to [comment:6 gagern]:
> Replying to [comment:5 leif]:
> > No idea how old libvpx 1.0.0 is.
>
> The new symbols are in the codebase since
[http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=webm/libvpx.git;a=commit;h=b6c71918ae9242f86d7e5b8313c64140c1c8eba3
May 2010]. They were first released with libvpx
[http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=webm/libvpx.git;a=tag;h=05049b1aa3c315592c140fd3a17b9cacdde2952e
0.9.1] from June 2010. So yes, applying the patch unconditionally should
be perfectly safe on all sane systems.
[[BR]]
Ok, thanks. Meanwhile checked, even Lucid with still a bit LTS ships
0.9.5 \o/
(Ubuntu is poor in other cases; e.g. 14.04 still ships GNU make 3.81,
released 2006.)
[[BR]]
In general I'd still check the version before applying version-specific
patches.
(@vbraun: necroposting FTW!)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18293#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
