#6246: SAGE_FAT_BINARY still doesn't work
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.1.1
Component: build | Keywords:
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by was):
{{{
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Dr. David Kirkby <[email protected]>
wrote:
Jason Moxham wrote:
>
> I guess the problem is this:
> when gcc is built you can specify the architecture that it defaults
to , and
> for this virtual machine the default arch is "higher" than cicero.
When MPIR
> builds a fat build it calls gcc with no march options so you get the
> default , what we should do is call gcc with march=486 etc
> This is as far as I can get , without access to systems that are
known to
> have this problem.
>
Unfortunately, I don't have easy access to a system to replicate the
problem either. The virtual machine where I was building the test binary
that I could try on cicero is down, and the VMware server admin web page
is also down. I'll likely have to do a slow and painful reboot of a lot
of stuff to get his fixed. I can also try building on an old laptop
that's in my office.
Thanks for the idea above, which I can try.
-- William
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6246#comment:2>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
