#18392: Add is_solid() and is_proper() for Polyhedral cones
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  mjo                |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  geometry           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Michael Orlitzky   |    Reviewers:  Andrey Novoseltsev
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/mjo/ticket/18392                 |  c7e16d9e9ca8a29c24d40a83693109618a0e3415
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by novoselt):

 * status:  needs_review => positive_review
 * work_issues:  doc format =>


Comment:

 Thank you! So - you have actually found these classes to be useful in
 optimization??? How is the performance? I imagine you need to work with
 cones of high dimension with many rays, while doable toric stuff tends to
 stick with small dimensions and simplicial cones.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18392#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to