#17218: Minimal bindings for acb's in the optional arb package
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: cheuberg | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: arb, Acb, complex | Merged in:
intervals | Reviewers:
Authors: Clemens Heuberger | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 4f3489b15538f1a8a7d64e27e207d262ceb99038
u/cheuberg/rings/complex_interval_acb| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #17194, #16747 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mmezzarobba):
Hi Vincent,
Replying to [comment:14 vdelecroix]:
> 3. Why did you changed the convention for equality? We have
> {{{
> sage: a = RIF(1,2)
> sage: a == a
> False
> }}}
See #17194 (and #17186) for the rationale.
As for this ticket, I'd like to suggest marking the whole module as
experimental (cf. `sage.misc.deprecated`) until the bindings are a bit
less minimal, in order to be able to make backward-incompatible changes
without deprecation while extending them. Of course, the experimental
warning would be removed after a while even if nothing changes. (I've
been planning to review this ticket and work on a counterpart of #17186
for weeks, but I didn't find time yet.) What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17218#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
