#17700: wrong symbolic results in case the answer is not known
--------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jakobkroeker | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: todo
--------------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by leif):
* milestone: sage-6.5 => sage-6.7
Comment:
Btw., also the coercion framework occasionally leads to "surprising"
results (because silently `False` is returned upon comparison when no
coercion can be established, such that for example `a == b and a == c`
doesn't imply `b == c`). This and similar has been discussed on sage-
devel a couple of times.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17700#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
