#18356: special resultants ``composed_sum`` and ``composed_product``
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  pernici            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  algebra            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:                     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/pernici/ticket/18356             |  1fe9b052c8f1e49f9b0480f40dfa1937ef9f8dcf
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Hi,

 Did you completely avoid the power series ring? We should provide more
 methods to polynomial like:
  - `inverse_series(self, prec, as_polynomial=False)`: return the inverse
 series and if `as_polynomial` is true returns it as a polynomial
 As FLINT has some native implementation, we should use it where it makes
 sense. But this should be done in another ticket.

 In all your code, you know in advance the precision needed. Right?

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18356#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to