#15209: Upgrade experimental libFES package to version 0.2
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Bouillaguet | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: packages: | Resolution:
experimental | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Charles | Work issues: type file
Bouillaguet, Travis Scholl | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 67016514210059a880fc7248ddd204f793121710
Branch: u/tscholl2/libFES | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* work_issues: => type file
* milestone: sage-6.4 => sage-6.8
Comment:
This needs a `type` file, see #18431.
> If it doesn't pass all tests, why is the ticket "needs review"?
Given that the current version also doesn't pass all tests and given that
it's an ''experimental'' package, I guess that's allowed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15209#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.