#15209: Upgrade experimental libFES package to version 0.2
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  Bouillaguet        |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:
  experimental                       |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Charles            |  Work issues:  type file
  Bouillaguet, Travis Scholl         |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  67016514210059a880fc7248ddd204f793121710
         Branch:  u/tscholl2/libFES  |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_work
 * work_issues:   => type file
 * milestone:  sage-6.4 => sage-6.8


Comment:

 This needs a `type` file, see #18431.

 > If it doesn't pass all tests, why is the ticket "needs review"?
 Given that the current version also doesn't pass all tests and given that
 it's an ''experimental'' package, I guess that's allowed.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15209#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to