#18393: make Expression.series return an element of SR[[]]
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  rws       |        Owner:
           Type:            |       Status:  positive_review
  enhancement               |    Milestone:  sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
       Priority:  major     |   Resolution:
      Component:  calculus  |    Merged in:
       Keywords:            |    Reviewers:
        Authors:            |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A       |       Commit:
         Branch:            |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:            |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Comment (by nbruin):

 Replying to [comment:13 rws]:
 > Interesting. But that can be considered a bug and see the sage-devel
 link for a bug report. I mean, what else do you expect as result when
 dealing with a series? But I'll open a new ticket for that.

 The problem is: there are SR allows expressions of such generality that
 series expansions aren't always possible. Consider:
 {{{
 sage: function('f')
 sage: s=series(sin(x))
 sage: f(cos(x))+g
 }}}
 Should that be considered a series in x?

 And then there are of course the cases with well-defined functions as
 ingredients where you really can't make a series expansion:
 {{{
 sage: s=series(sin(x))
 sage: exp(1/x)+s
 }}}

 The general problem is: an element of SR (and the fundamental data type in
 maple) is just an expression tree. Mathematical meaning is only obtained
 by *what* you do with the element (it's like an untyped programming
 language). That means you can do algebra with objects in SR that represent
 a series in such a way that you get another object that can't possibly be
 interpreted as a series.
 maple (and apparently pynac by default) solves that problem by not even
 trying: they leave it to the user to do that, trusting that he/she will
 take care to only do that in situations where it is possible to interpret
 the result as a series.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18393#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to