#18467: PolynomialRealDense.quo_rem() returns zero polynomials with wrong degree
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: basic arithmetic | Resolution:
Keywords: polynomial degree | Merged in:
quo_rem | Reviewers: Bruno Grenet
Authors: Peter Bruin | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 9dc90cc9367a016745c85326d7a8abfabe2e3d53
u/pbruin/18467-quo_rem | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by bruno):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:3 pbruin]:
> Replying to [comment:2 bruno]:
> > Looks fine to me! A minor comment: It seems that people prefer not
referring to {{{`self`}}} in the documentation
> If you really insist I can change it, but I personally prefer `self`
over `this polynomial` (see comment:5:ticket:13442).
>
> There was some recent discussion on a related question, namely whether
`self` should be documented in `INPUT` sections of methods. On that
question I agree with most people that it should not.
Actually, I was referring to (the beginning of)
[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sage-devel/self/sage-
devel/58RUzV32vI0/rf4Mldr60JkJ this discussion]. Yet there does not seem
to be a consensus. And I do not have a strong opinion on this... so I do
not insist!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18467#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
