#18560: Upgrade arb to 2.6.0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: cheuberg | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: packages: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: arb | Reviewers:
Authors: Clemens Heuberger | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 8d0b5995900b15f4594421f9baac0fe0faaa6574
u/cheuberg/libs/arb-2.6.0 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by cheuberg):
Replying to [comment:3 mmezzarobba]:
> Perhaps it would be better to add tolerances so that the tests pass with
both versions of arb. What do you think?
- I do not know whether the doctest framework can handle this --- how
would it cope with the special representation of a `RealBall`?
- I think that at least some kind of plausibility checking is interesting
--- if the old and new balls do not intersect, we'd be in trouble.
- On the other hand, changing doctests with each new revision of arb seems
to be uncomfortable, too.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18560#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
