#18565: sequences in SageMath
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dkrenn/sequences/base | fa5c40a727f7149fee86e893fc52f27455622929
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dkrenn):
Replying to [comment:4 vdelecroix]:
> Replying to [comment:3 dkrenn]:
> > Replying to [comment:2 vdelecroix]:
> > > Could you define what you mean by '''sequence'''. Is it sequence of
numbers? Rational numbers? Real numbers? An element of an '''infinite
cartesian power'''?
> > What I head in mind is a sequence of numbers (usually intergers,
rationals, maybe reals). [...]
>
> Then you are more restrictive than
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence wikipedia] in which a sequence is
even allowed to be finite.
I am happy to make it as general as needed.
> I do not have suggestion beyond ''having precise specifications''.
Like: Finite and infinite sequences where the elements can be any sage
objects (but all of the same type/parent)?
Best,
Daniel
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18565#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
