#18584: Iterator through magma elements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: sagedays64.5 | Merged in:
Authors: Christian Stump | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues: document
Branch: | Commit:
u/stumpc5/iterator_through_magma_elements|
154e2ea9207b5bedcb2bf38fe899d139d1159012
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:14 stumpc5]:
> > Christian: what's your use case?
>
> I wanted (back when writing the never-finished-coxeter-group-stuff) to
use an iterator through the reflection group, keeping track of the used
word along the way.
Ok; so having it on a semigroup is enough for you.
> > Which raises a good question: could we implement this with the current
RecursivelyEnumeratedSet?
>
> Sorry, could you point to which question you refer? The way the iterator
is implemented, or implementing a flag to attach the used word to the
output?
My question was about the implementation of an iterator over a finitely
generated magma using only `RecursivelyEnumeratedSet`. But if there is no
explicit need for this feature right now, we might as well not worry about
it.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18584#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
