#18589: isogeny efficiency improvement
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
cremona | Status: needs_work
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.8
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
elliptic curves | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
isogeny | 47ccfd587402b953c612fcd3cddaa541a6847bd3
Authors: John | Stopgaps:
Cremona |
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/cremona/18589 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:8 cremona]:
> No, but it is Example 3.1.1 on page 28 of [KT2013] which is here:
http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/57568/
> The example is over F_3 so is not slow.
Wouldn't it be a good testcase for the current code (both over F_3 and
F_9)?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18589#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.