#6634: [with spkg, needs review] biopython 1.49b broken with python-2.6;
biopython
upgrade
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: optional packages | Keywords: biopython, bioinformatics
Reviewer: tkeller | Author:
Merged: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by mhampton):
* reviewer: => tkeller
Comment:
tkeller,
Can you review this new package? Besides testing installation, if you
check that the spkg-install and SPKG.txt make sense then you can change
the heading to [with spkg, positive review] and this can go into the
optional packages.
In case you don't know, spkgs are just .tar.bz files with the extension
renamed. I usually unpack a temporary copy somewhere other than my sage
folder in order to take a look when reviewing.
-Marshall
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6634#comment:4>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
