#18453: Infinite affine crystals should use extended weight lattice
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bump | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: crystals | Merged in:
Authors: Ben Salisbury, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Travis Scrimshaw | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 9225af71b4dbcfa6c748816c452e9824dadc3651
public/crystal/18453 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
I'm pretty sure this will not end up fixing most of the problems and it
feels like we're hacking around the problem. At the very least as a better
patch, I think we could solve a host of issues by just checking if the
type is affine and if the crystal is not in finite crystals to pass
`extended=True`. However I will fix the RC code and test a bunch of the
different models in affine type as soon as I'm able to today.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18453#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
