#18453: Infinite affine crystals should use extended weight lattice
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  bump               |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  crystals, days65   |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Ben Salisbury,     |    Reviewers:  Dan Bump
  Anne Schilling, Travis Scrimshaw   |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  f4955c5f50d4f34510176acff8956f49d3b8702a
  public/crystal/18453               |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by bump):

 From the thematic tutorial at
 http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/thematic_tutorials/lie/affine_hw_crystals.html
 we have:

 {{{
 sage: sage: La =
 RootSystem(['C',3,1]).weight_space().fundamental_weights()
 sage: sage: LS = crystals.LSPaths(2*La[1]+La[2])
 sage: sage: SL = LS.subcrystal(max_depth=3)
 sage: sage: GL = LS.digraph(subset=SL)
 sage: sage: La =
 RootSystem(['C',3,1]).weight_lattice().fundamental_weights()
 sage: sage: M = crystals.NakajimaMonomials(['C',3,1], 2*La[1]+La[2])
 sage: sage: SM = M.subcrystal(max_depth=3)
 sage: sage: GM = M.digraph(subset=SM)
 sage: sage: GL.is_isomorphic(GM, edge_labels=True)
 True
 }}}

 Why do we use weight_space for one and weight_lattice for the other?
 (Maybe the thematic tutorial should explain.)

 After this:

 {{{
 sage: LS.weight_lattice_realization().is_extended()
 False
 sage: M.weight_lattice_realization().is_extended()
 True
 }}}

 I think the point of the example in the tutorial is that the two crystals
 are isomorphic, but one uses the extended lattice and the other does not.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18453#comment:44>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to