#18398: Automate Branching Rules for IntegrableRepresentations
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bump | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Bump | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/combinat/branching-15398 | 1ee0267f7bf4a926a3f6e0295a08be464e2e529f
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
I think it would be better if we implement a method on the various
`CartanType` classes which does the respective branching rules. In #15463,
I go part of the way there by implementing a `subtype` method, but I think
we should take that idea and expand on it here, and then use `subtype` to
do the branching rule here. Does this sound like a good approach or do you
need something more direct here (FYI - I haven't looked too closely at
this patch yet)?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18398#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
