#15584: Some more affine crystals
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |    Reviewers:  Ben Salisbury
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/combinat/crystals/more_affine|  
207520d9f96761ad371912b4aa1c96ba50357880
   Dependencies:  #16172 #18769      |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by bsalisbury1):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_work
 * reviewer:   => Ben Salisbury
 * milestone:  sage-6.4 => sage-6.8


Comment:

 Hi Travis,

 There are still some things that need to be changed with the
 multipartition model and the multisegment model. Some highlights:

 - The Kleschev multipartition model and the JMMO multipartition model are
 closely related; perhaps both should be on the same ticket.  Moreover, the
 display of these partitions should include the residues in cells of the
 partitions so that the charge of the partition is clear to the user
 (though maybe you have added this already after we talked a while back).

 - There are two well-known crystal structures on multisegments, and they
 are related by the star-crystal operators.  The convention being used
 should be clear and probably even the star-crystal operators should be
 added.  In particular, see the 2009 paper by Jacon and Lecouvey in Pac. J.
 Math.  It is my personal opinion that the notation and structure of that
 paper is the one that should be followed for the implementation, including
 changing the data structure of the multisegments to use dictionaries of
 the form `{(interval) : coefficient}`.

 I vaguely remember there being some additional changes, too, but I can't
 be more specific until I have time to delve deeper into the patch.

 Best,
 Ben

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15584#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to