#18897: Memory leak in polynomial_compiled.univar_pd
---------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: slabbe | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: memleak | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by slabbe):
Those `univar_pd` are created in the class `CompiledPolynomialFunction`
which provides an easy way to create the problem:
{{{
#!python
def test():
from sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_compiled import
CompiledPolynomialFunction
import gc
from collections import Counter
gc.collect()
pre={id(c) for c in gc.get_objects()}
L = [-1, 9, -22, 21, -8, 1]
for _ in range(100):
CompiledPolynomialFunction(L)
gc.collect()
post=Counter(type(o) for o in gc.get_objects() if id(o) not in pre)
return [(k,v) for (k,v) in post.iteritems() if v>10]
}}}
and we get:
{{{
#!python
sage: test()
[(<type 'sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_compiled.univar_pd'>, 100)]
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18897#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
