#18897: Memory leak in polynomial_compiled.univar_pd
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
slabbe | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.8
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
memleak | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: Simon | 6d340771137df00b0da8a24485a95383f111d533
King | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18897 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
PPS: Why is the implementation of binary trees in
sage.combinat.binary_tree totally orthogonal to the one in
sage.misc.binary_tree?
I'll ask on sage.combinat, and I suppose moving to sage.data_structure and
unification of the two implementations should be on a separate ticket. So,
I'll do the additional simplification now, and everything else is for
later.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18897#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
