#18905: fix more leaks found in #18897
---------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: memleak | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #18897 | Stopgaps:
---------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:23 nbruin]:
> I get pretty good plots from
> {{{
> objgraph.show_backrefs(L,filename='plot.png',max_depth=5)
> }}}
Ahm, L?? That's a list.
> It seems a global link exists here:
> {{{
> sage: [a for a in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_ring_constructor.__dict__['_cache'].keys()
if id(a[0]) == id(L[0])]
> [(Finite Field of size 31, ('x',), False, None),
> (Finite Field of size 31, ('x',), False, 'FLINT')]
> }}}
Of course. As long as `P=GF(31)['x']` lives, its base ring will live, too.
The question is why the polynomial ring can't be collected. So, perhaps it
would be better to try and find a chain for the polynomial ring instead.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18905#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
