#18941: Poset documentation polishing: chains
----------------------------------+----------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo      |        Owner:
           Type:  defect          |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major           |    Milestone:  sage-feature
      Component:  documentation   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                  |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo  |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A             |  Work issues:
         Branch:                  |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                  |     Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+----------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):

 * type:  enhancement => defect


Old description:

> Do some polishing to `is_chain_of_poset()`, `maximal_antichains()` and so
> on at `posets.py`.

New description:

 Do some polishing to `is_chain_of_poset()`, `maximal_antichains()` and so
 on at `posets.py`.

 Bugs:

 {{{
 P = Posets.BooleanLattice(3).relabel(lambda x: chr(ord('a')+x))
 P.maximal_chains(partial=['b','c'])
 }}}

 outputs `['b', 'c', 'd', 'h']` which is not a chain at all.

--

Comment:

 Found a bug -> type changed to defect.

 Which one is correct: "Return the chains of the poset.", "Return all the
 chains of the poset.", "Return all chains of the poset." or "Return chains
 of the poset."?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18941#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to