#15718: Implement the __init_extra__ protocol of categories for Cython classes.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Simon King | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues: Ensure that
Branch: | __init_extra__ is called in the
u/SimonKing/implement_the___init_extra___protocol_of_categories_for_cython_classes_|
right moment
Dependencies: | Commit:
| 3c36b95990f755ac80ab44e3b709240e2e751c0a
| Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:25 SimonKing]:
> Should we perhaps modify `CategoryObject.__init__`, which currently just
defines `self._base` and then initialises the category? It could
additionally define a base for the parent, if the given category has a
base.
It looks like a good idea, but would break an awful lot of things. `:-(`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15718#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
