#18210: numerical bug in incomplete gamma function
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  VivianePons                    |        Owner:
           Type:  defect                         |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major                          |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  symbolics                      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  sd67                           |    Merged in:
        Authors:                                 |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  Reported upstream. Developers  |  Work issues:
  acknowledge bug.                               |       Commit:
         Branch:                                 |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                                 |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by rws):

 Replying to [comment:22 buck]:
 > @rws: Could you expand on the "two different bugs" and link them (and/or
 create tickets for them)?
 Okay, this ticket is the `(60,30)` bug from comment:13, i.e. `gamma(60,
 30).numerical_approx()`. The other one is the fact that `gamma(25,14.5)`
 and `CC(25).gamma_inc(14.5)`, which both use libpari, give
 {{{
 sage: CC(25).gamma_inc(14.5)
 6.86802286928673e23
 sage: gamma(25,14.5)
 6.86802286928673e23
 }}}
 while
 {{{
 sage: pari('incgam(25, 14.5)')
 6.15736429994994 E23
 }}}
 But then, we see also
 {{{
 sage: pari('incgam(60,30)')
 -1.23084064495469 E74
 sage: gamma(60,30).n()
 -1.28306738270893e74
 }}}
 so there is a mismatch between the two interfaces, and the gp interface is
 sometimes right where libpari is wrong.
 > Also, could you explain why "because it uses the gp interface" would
 obscure the negative-number return value?
 Because the gp interface is sometimes right, apparently.

 However, I don't think it useful to open two tickets as long as we don't
 know if there really are two different bugs.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18210#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to