#18972: twographs and Seidel switching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  dimpase            |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:                     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/dimpase/seidelsw                 |  b76c9a0369a5babc98481d6b96125c9b86f1adc9
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > There are many papers and book chapters written about Seidel adjacency
 matrix and Seidel switching.

 I had never heard of it before today. Hard to miss the laplacian matrix,
 though.

 > I don't know what you are talking about: go read
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_sugar
 > Googling "syntactic sugar" gives you over 300,000 hits.

 It was mostly a joke. I did not expect him to have invented the sentence.

 > Anyhow, if you are not willing to allow `Seidel_adjacency_matrix` into
 Sage graphs, I'd stop working on this implementation now.

 Did you hear me say that I "would not allow it"? For sure I don't like it,
 but that did not stop me from accepting code that other thought useful.
 Also, you add long lines of code to an already very very heavy
 constructor, while you could turn it into an adjacency matrix with a one-
 liner.. But that would result in possibly misleading error messages.

 What I said is that I do not see the added value and it is true. I said
 that the best way to write seydel_switching was to not use this new
 function. And also that it should be in small case unless a new standard
 is decided that applies to all of sage.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18972#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to