#18714: Dual bases for finite fields
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tgagne | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: finite rings | Resolution:
Keywords: dual basis, | Merged in:
finite field | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
Authors: Thomas Gagne | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 522766cd140cccb4dd4c88dba547ddbcccdf30f1
u/tgagne/dual_basis_finite_field | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Sorry to be annoying with english details:
- in the description you can not start with `In particular`. The sentence
is not a particular case of what was before. Simply start with `If `\{e_0,
e_1, ..., e_{n-1}\}` is ...`. You can also say that it is the dual basis
over `GF(p)` with respect to the bilinear form `Tr`.
- replace `is another basis` with `is the other basis`. The dual basis is
unique right?
Beyond that everything looks good to me.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18714#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
