#19045: better subs method for matrices
------------------------------+-------------------------------------
   Reporter:  vdelecroix      |            Owner:
       Type:  enhancement     |           Status:  new
   Priority:  major           |        Milestone:  sage-6.9
  Component:  linear algebra  |         Keywords:
  Merged in:                  |          Authors:  Vincent Delecroix
  Reviewers:                  |  Report Upstream:  N/A
Work issues:                  |           Branch:
     Commit:                  |     Dependencies:
   Stopgaps:                  |
------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 As mentioned on [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-
 devel/n2Sc8moP7Jk this sage-devel thread] the `.subs()` method of matrices
 behaves badly with polynomials.
 {{{#!python
 sage: x = polygen(ZZ)
 sage: matrix([[x]]).subs(x=1)
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 ...
 ValueError: must not specify both a keyword and positional argument
 sage: x.subs(1).parent()
 Integer Ring
 sage: matrix([[x]]).subs(1).parent()
 Full MatrixSpace of 1 by 1 dense matrices over Univariate
 Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19045>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to